belizetimes

Saturday
Mar 13th
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Auto width resolution
  • Increase font size
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • default color
  • red color
  • green color
Home arrow Links arrow Blog arrow Placencia For Sale
Placencia For Sale Print E-mail
(7 votes)
Monday, 17 August 2009

ImagePlacencia has achieved the remarkable feat of a smooth transition from an isolated fishing community to a significant feature on the international tourist trail in a matter of decades.  Yet it hasn’t lost its roots: rather it has become somewhat of the Playa del Carmen of Belize – one step down from the main tourist ‘trap’ (San Pedro in Belize, and Cancun in Mexico).  It hasn’t, then, marketed itself beyond all recognition, nor ‘sold’ itself.  Until now!

            It appears that the current Department of Environment has phenomenal money-making plans for our unique peninsula, and is proceeding full-steam ahead in a bid to develop the area beyond all recognition, and to reap the personal rewards that will no doubt come with this transition.

To list all the developments currently in progress which have received planning permission since the change of government in 2008 would just about fill this entire edition of the Belize Times.  But a few of the most controversial include the creation of ‘Placencia North International Airport’, a vast development under the auspice of ‘The Placencia Hotel and Residencies’ and ‘The Placencia Resort’; this is all without mention of plans for the Robert Trent Jones II Golf Course occupying almost 50 acres on the delicate landward side of the peninsula, the entire transformation of nearby Rendezvous Caye,  the building approval for a resort on Harvest Caye with yet another airstrip, and the potential approval of ‘Placencia Marina’.

            News has barely seeped out into Belizean mainstream conversation that we are soon to host another International Airport, second to the Philip W. Goldson International Airport in Ladyville.  Nor has the general public appreciated the implications of the ‘Placencia Marina’, which is aimed to accommodate up to 210 vessels, from 30-foot skiffs to200-foot yachts, despite the fact that just 1.5 miles further north, Ara Macao already has valid planning permission for a 400 berth marina, granted in January 2007.  And that is just to touch the tip of the iceberg: approval for thousands of hotel rooms has been granted, located on just about every available space on both sides of the Peninsula, all of which are contracted to Marco Caruso (he is certainly a lucky man to have so many construction contracts fall into his lap, but that is another story altogether).  There are also legitimate rumours of a casino, of which the Department of Environment claims to know nothing about, despite its construction already being nearly entirely completed and despite confirmation from potential Canadian investors that the Casino site is specifically identified during investment pitches.  And time shares (fractional interests) and individual lots are being sold to non-Belizeans through a potentially dubious ‘wealth-enhancement’ investment club which will surely only perpetuate current levels of scams and corruption.  It seems there is not a pocket of the old ‘Placencia’ that will be left untouched.

            Residents can no longer keep their concern to themselves, as it becomes ever more apparent that some form of corruption probably lies at the heart of the matter.  The Placencia Peninsula is, by definition, a delicate environmental area because of its precarious, low-lying position bordered to the West by the lagoon, and to the East by the sea.  Thus every planning application should be carefully considered for its potential implications on the local environment, from soil dredging, to depleting water reserves for non-natural purposes, to the sheer impact of creating such a vast tourist destination within an environmentally vulnerable area.  With utilities (including electricity, water and sewage disposal) already stretched to capacity in the area, it seems negligent that no comprehensive report has been undertaken to measure the deficit between available supply and potential demand.  This is without considering the Peninsula as a biological haven in itself, which should be protected for providing unique habitats for hundreds of species of flora and fauna.

            The bleak reality, however, is that the official body designed to protect the environment is in fact more than dubious itself.  The National Environment Advisory Committee (NEAC) is legally charged with approving or denying planning permission on the grounds of individual environmental reviews.  This surely constitutes a Public Committee then – one designed for the betterment and sustainable development of our country.  Yet a Department of Environment representative, Mr Anthony Mai, actually confirmed that the membership of the NEAC is not revealed to the public, and nor are its meeting minutes released for public review.

            The active community group, Placencia Citizens for Sustainable Development (PCSD), issued a press release shortly after Mr. Mai’s announcement in June, questioning the suspicious secrecy surrounding the committee, although no response has ever been given.  Perhaps even worse is that at the public meeting on the Peninsula, members of the community were asked to present their names and addresses in front of video cameras before they were able to make a comment to the committee – if this isn’t a bullying tactic for silencing petitioners then surely we at least deserve the real explanation for this apparent ‘scare’ procedure?

            Even for a government that has a history of caucus decision making, despite an abundance of ‘transparent’ rhetoric, the secretive tactics and performance practices of the NEAC seem unjustifiably ludicrous.  Unless, of course, selling the Placencia Peninsula is benefitting the pockets of our public officials.  Which is really the only logical conclusion to be drawn until the Department of Environment, and its affiliated National Environment Advisory Committee, breaks its silence.  It seems the time has come wen Belizean citizens want answers as to the whole’sale’ development of our country. 


Add as favourites (25) | Views: 1153 | Print | E-mail

  Comments (4)
1. We Need Leadership
Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 18-08-2009 03:06
It seems that anyone can get anything approved on the Placencia Peninsula -- and pretty much in the rest of the country -- if they have the money and talk enough about jobs. 
 
But people on the Placencia Peinsula are tired of hearing about jobs that never seem to materialize. Take a drive down the Peninsula and past the new airport under construction and see who is working there. You certainly won't find many employees who call Seine Bight, Placencia, Maya Beach or Riversdale their home. 
 
Where is our leadership in this country? We need sound planning that preserves our natural, cultural and social resources. That doesn't mean no development, it means smart development.  
 
Eco-tourism is the fastest growing segment of the international tourism market today. That's what Belize has and what Belize is good at. 
 
But, what do we do? We run the other way - approving casinos and marinas and condos when the rest of the world is yawning - been there, done that, bought the T-shirt. 
 
Has anyone in our government - which is supposed to provide leadership for the BENEFIT of the people of Belize (and not foreign developers) --taken even an hour to sit down and read on the Internet what our visitors say about Belize?  
 
They don't extoll large resorts and the Princess Casino - they talk about the beauty of the Maya Mountains, the exhiliration of cave tubing and diving/snorkeling our reefs, and most of all our people - their kindness and sheer joy in sharing this country with the people who come to experience it. 
 
Take some of that money being granted in concessions to foreign developers and help the existing Belizean-owned businesses not only survive, but provide a better, more professional product for the tourists who value what we are and what we already have to offer them. 
 
The world already has enough Cancuns for those people who want that type of vacation. Belize shouldn't even try to be all things to all people. We need help from the government to protect, preserve and better what we have and are in imminent danger of losing.
2. Sustainable development?
Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 18-08-2009 15:50
The Placencia Peninsula is fast turning into the Cancun of belize that the developers boast of. The local environment has already been damaged, and the building of the mega resorts can only make matters worse.  
The jewel that we often refer to as Belize is fast losing its environmental credentials as the uncontrolled expansion is allowed to proceed. Clearing of mangroves, dredging of marinas, draing of wetlands, are all contributing to this mess. 
When the international community finally realises what is happening here, the government will face some difficult decisions. 
The people of Belize must unite and say NO MORE, before it is too late
3. pslakdgp
Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 14-01-2010 00:41
[URL=http://bjipyqfq.com]qynhphlz[/URL] czzavqrf http://bjkpqmia.com gezfopmq lfiquqxi qbueqzpm
4. pslakdgp
Written by This e-mail address is being protected from spam bots, you need JavaScript enabled to view it , on 14-01-2010 00:41
[URL=http://bjipyqfq.com]qynhphlz[/URL] czzavqrf http://bjkpqmia.com gezfopmq lfiquqxi qbueqzpm

Write Comment
  • Please keep the topic of messages relevant to the subject of the article.
  • Personal verbal attacks will be deleted.
  • Please don't use comments to plug your web site. Such material will be removed.
  • Just ensure to *Refresh* your browser for a new security code to be displayed prior to clicking on the 'Send' button.
  • Keep in mind that the above process only applies if you simply entered the wrong security code.
Name:
E-mail
Title:
Comment:

Code:* Code
I wish to be contacted by email regarding additional comments

 
< Prev   Next >

TRANSLATE

EnglishFrenchGermanItalianPortugueseRussianSpanish

Advertisement

182x94.gif

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

  CRM