| Barbarians at the gates of Hoity-toity Land |
|
|
| Written by by Andrew Steinhauer | |
| Tuesday, 02 October 2007 | |
|
After much to do over the opening of the new Bliss this last
weekend, both glowingly positive and abjectly negative, the dust has settled
and low and behold, the edifice stands strong. If the first three nights are
any indication, the new, snazzy Bliss is a posh venue for our Belizean artists
to strut their stuff- no holds barred.
All those naysayers that predicted (wished?) all kinds of
woe for the new arts venue were surely disappointed for the Bliss is back,
better than ever. And more egalitarian than ever. Unlike the old Bliss which
opened its doors in 1955 and from day one was the proud bastion of the
well-heeled and well-connected colonial elite, the new elegantly muscular edifice
caters to everyone, is classless and gives access to all creative types, from
the ghetto to the golden boys rich and famous.
The old Bliss was in many ways a monument to Neo-Colonialism
and Hoity-toity Land. The dramatic works performed there were by and large
culled from Mama
"Weh Jon Jon De?" actors during play
Conversely if some upstart young Barbarian playwright dared attack the European status quo of Hoity-toity Land by writing a play in Creole, dealing with Belizean themes that took place in a local setting that playwright’s work was deemed inappropriate to be performed in the hallowed halls of the old Bliss and in effect such transgressing work was pronounced by the Royal Creole elite who ruled the Bliss as bad. So be it. In 1972 a young social/cultural radical writer authored a play incorporating the three no-no’s: (1) Creole dialogue, (2) Belizean themes, (from a decidedly grass-roots viewpoint) and (3) local setting. The play was titled, “Weh Jon Jon De?” and this so-called transgressing piece, (at least in the eyes of the old timer Bliss culture czars) was penned by social activist Evan X Hyde. In the Bliss’ power-brokers’ view, the barbarian was at the gate of Hoity-toity Land. And they didn’t let him in. The shunning didn’t last forever, but it took five years before ‘Jon Jon’ was produced. How times have changed. Now as part of the new Bliss’ grand opening weekend the previously spurned ‘Jon Jon’ play was revived and headlined at Sunday’s festivities. The barbarian is now welcomed in the new Bliss with open arms. Adios European elitism, hola home grown egalitarianism. The play ‘Weh Jon Jon De’ kicked up a lot of dust in its day, so now after a 27 year hibernation how does the drama weather the wages of time? The looming question in this critic’s mind was, does it still have ‘juice’ or has it become one of those eccentrically quaint cultural artifacts that Meg Craig loves to preserve, to be dusted off and displayed at ‘golden oldies’ historical shindigs? To cut to the chase, it still has juice. ‘Jon Jon’ is a potent brew of street-smarts, cultural critique, class indoctrination, social satire and love-hurts, piquantly seasoned with a subtext of sex interfacing brutality.
The two directors, Michael Coye and Diane Haylock and their
large cast of 19 actors went all out in bringing Hyde’s trailblazing opus
alive. The play is time-specific, and it captures the ebb and flow of the
everyday life and loves of the proletariat Creoles in
Times have changed since 1972 when Hyde composed this drama.
In 1972 the evil dynamic duo, the drug and gang cultures courtesy of
Back in 1972 working class Creoles in The predominately teenage troupe with little to no acting experience gave no-holds-barred performances. Ninety-nine percent of the cast interpreted their parts in spirited, energetic manner. Of special note were the performances of Melton Morrison, Stephanie Young, Linda Blease, Paul Hope and Shanta Morrison.
Melton’s interpretation of the Policeman ‘Beast’ was
drenched in testosterone and sweat. Melton, who in real life is one of the most
mannerly, unassertive young men in Stephanie Young, the only seasoned veteran in the cast, gave a full bodied performance with her ‘Sketelish’ club gal, Martha. Her scene where she sat on the bed, getting all dolled up for a marathon night of clubbing, chatting obsessively with her friend ‘Beauty’ (Jackline Castillo) was right on the money. A colorful take on a desperate disco-queen. Linda Blease created a comedic gem in her role as Mary, the stuttering princess of gossip in stand pipe land. Her highly animated, over-the-top interpretation went beyond parody into a goofy place only Lucy Ball and Whoopie Goldberg dare to tread.
Paul Hope as the flashy character ‘American’ gave a well
modulated turn in a difficult role. The ‘American’ part is tricky because that
character is playing a role within a role. One was his normal persona, a
down-home, dice-loving Everyday-Joe and the other was his created persona, a
bragging, worldly dude with all the answers back from a stay in the States.
There is Hope for Shanta Morrison tackled the centerpiece role of June with vim and vigor. Shanta played Jon Jon’s love interest in a physical manner, shading her part with comedic twists and pathos turns. She embodied the awkward movements and difficulty in sitting, bending and turning that late term pregnancy causes. Her final plaintive wail at the end of the play was horrific and haunting. For mysterious reasons ‘Jon Jon’ played only one night, Sunday. The young troupe was only given one chance at the plate. Usually in theatre, the first couple of performances before live audiences are the times the director and actors need to iron out the problems and get the whole kit and caboodle together into one smooth running entity. This talented crew didn’t have that luxury. It was do or die one time. With more stage time the one weak link in the play, the lackluster interpretation of lead character Jon Jon would have surely become more dynamic. As it was played Sunday night just about the entire first act was in anticipation of Jon Jon’s arrival. Jon Jon this, Jon Jon that. Then when Jon Jon finally comes on stage at the beginning of the second act, the first time actor, Shedrac Ariola, was just too non-assertive, laid-back to command all the attention he was given in act one. Charismatic he was not.
That said, ‘Whe Jon Jon De’ was an important dramatic event.
It proved that a shrewdly written period play doesn’t lose its vitality over
time. It shows that |
|
| Last Updated ( Tuesday, 02 October 2007 ) |
| < Prev | Next > |
|---|